What do charred deserts, dessicated forests and climate refugees mean to you?
That's right - economic opportunity!
Disaster capitalism goes "eco": read my article for the Baffler here
Sunday, 18 January 2015
Sunday, 4 January 2015
The 9th most exciting city in the world
If you're in charge of a crumbling post-industrial city, what do you do to add a bit of "vibrancy", "energy" and "creativity"?
Here are some of the options!
• build a new Leisure centre;
• build something that looks a bit like a new Leisure centre, but is actually a Sports centre;
• build something that isn’t a Leisure centre or a Sports centre, but which might just be an Arts centre;
• build something made out of glass;
• organise a free ‘street party’ in summer, featuring a) bongos; b) a rock band who got into the top 40 in 2001; c) a radio presenter ‘celebrity’ who you’d quietly assumed had died; d) a nineteen year old girl with a poem and a drum; e) a stall handing out free styrofoam cups of orange squash; f) a dawning yet profound sense of the pointlessness of your existence on earth that gnaws at your soul like a nail-file applied to the spinal column; g) hot dogs; h) funny men on stilts dressed to look like the police; i) the police.
• build a bridge; (you need to make sure there's some water there first)
• commission a piece of “public art” that looks like a cube being assaulted by a beach ball;
• build another Leisure centre;
• encourage the large-scale privatisation of public space by handing over to a load of coffee chains and shadowy PFI financiers;
• build a “Cultural Quarter”;
• commission another piece of “public art” that has everyone confused, but probably means something about diversity;
• if none of the above work, invest in local services like decent housing, education and public services. (Note: try everything else first).
I mention this because this week Birmingham's just been announced by the Rough Guide as the ninth most exciting city on the planet - for “embracing its industrial heritage”.
I once embraced Birmingham's industrial heritage, too, for a day, and I have to say the adjective that sprung to mind wasn't "exciting". It was quite a long way from "exciting", in fact. Among the must-see attractions like the "College of Food, Tourism and Creative Studies", the "Academy of Birmingham Cosmetic Dentristy" as well as other enticing hotspots like the "Gas Street Basin" - which frankly sounded more like an industrial accident than a tourist attraction - I actually ended up spending most of my day in Birmingham in a Wetherspoons that seemed to have been hollowed out of a multi-storey car park. It was named Paradise. It wasn't.
But so what? Cities shouldn't have to be exciting. They're supposed to be places for living in. The problem with branding a whole city with estate-agent propaganda ("creative", "vibrant", "dynamic") is that it promotes a twatscape of moneyed gentrifiers and buy-to-lets. Trying to market Birmingham as a tourist hotspot makes about as much sense as relocating the next Sundance Film Festival to Slough. Let Birmingham be itself. It comes first in that contest any day.
Here are some of the options!
• build something that looks a bit like a new Leisure centre, but is actually a Sports centre;
• build something that isn’t a Leisure centre or a Sports centre, but which might just be an Arts centre;
• build something made out of glass;
• organise a free ‘street party’ in summer, featuring a) bongos; b) a rock band who got into the top 40 in 2001; c) a radio presenter ‘celebrity’ who you’d quietly assumed had died; d) a nineteen year old girl with a poem and a drum; e) a stall handing out free styrofoam cups of orange squash; f) a dawning yet profound sense of the pointlessness of your existence on earth that gnaws at your soul like a nail-file applied to the spinal column; g) hot dogs; h) funny men on stilts dressed to look like the police; i) the police.
• build a bridge; (you need to make sure there's some water there first)
• commission a piece of “public art” that looks like a cube being assaulted by a beach ball;
• build another Leisure centre;
• encourage the large-scale privatisation of public space by handing over to a load of coffee chains and shadowy PFI financiers;
• build a “Cultural Quarter”;
• commission another piece of “public art” that has everyone confused, but probably means something about diversity;
• if none of the above work, invest in local services like decent housing, education and public services. (Note: try everything else first).
I mention this because this week Birmingham's just been announced by the Rough Guide as the ninth most exciting city on the planet - for “embracing its industrial heritage”.
I once embraced Birmingham's industrial heritage, too, for a day, and I have to say the adjective that sprung to mind wasn't "exciting". It was quite a long way from "exciting", in fact. Among the must-see attractions like the "College of Food, Tourism and Creative Studies", the "Academy of Birmingham Cosmetic Dentristy" as well as other enticing hotspots like the "Gas Street Basin" - which frankly sounded more like an industrial accident than a tourist attraction - I actually ended up spending most of my day in Birmingham in a Wetherspoons that seemed to have been hollowed out of a multi-storey car park. It was named Paradise. It wasn't.
But so what? Cities shouldn't have to be exciting. They're supposed to be places for living in. The problem with branding a whole city with estate-agent propaganda ("creative", "vibrant", "dynamic") is that it promotes a twatscape of moneyed gentrifiers and buy-to-lets. Trying to market Birmingham as a tourist hotspot makes about as much sense as relocating the next Sundance Film Festival to Slough. Let Birmingham be itself. It comes first in that contest any day.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)